| |
|
|||
| overview + highlights | ||||
|
|
A new idea often has its seed in a unexpected occurrence: While listening to two digital cables of the same type, certain differences were audible. Further measurements showed that these cables had different qualities. One of the cables didnt transfer high frequency signals in one direction at all and they also performed irregular in signal transferring in both directions. A closer look at other cables, also of the highest price categories, revealed shocking results: production tolerances and bad cable termination lead to differences only expected among cables of different constructions! These were the initial thoughts of making cables ourselves. The characteristic feature is a permanent constant impedance behaviour, giving cicable its name, as cicable stands for constant impedance cable. In the past few years, no other HiFi component has been more controversial than the theory and effect of cables. Opinions ran from »makes your HiFi system sound totally different« to »nonsense, illusion, and voodoo«. It is obvious that permanent quality improvements of devices and circuitry as well as new modern measuring systems have lead to greater scrutiny of all parameters. Matters rated negligible a few years ago are gaining more importance due to new perceptions and techniques. Optimal signal conduction surely belongs to these matters, last but not least evoked by digital technology. Certainly the characteristics of cables belong to these matters too, as their quality is essential for the capability of conductions. As analogue circuits became more broadband over the past few years, they also became more receptive for internal or external distortions. Modern HiFi systems are bound to digital technology, either in terms of signal processing or as part of menudriven processor controlling which operates frequencies in the MHz band. Anyhow, materials may influence the qualities of a cable, but in general more fundamental parameters define the qualities of cables. To understand why cables perform and sound different needs an understanding of the basic technical processes and their transformation in development and manufacturing. Cables dont sound »right« or »wrong«, »good« or »bad«. Theyre rather part of a system connecting output and input, bridging the gap between transmitter and receiver. Unfortunately cable terminations arent standardized; every manufacturer pursues different technical objectives, and especially in highend configurations the most different components are linked together. Based on previous thoughts our task is the development of cables with consistent qualities, independent from input and output. Unfortunately the resistance parameters are not only purely resistive for direct voltage and alternating voltage, but they are also capacitive and inductive. Those apparent powers have a bigger significance than the pure direct voltage. The differences between the resistance at ac voltages [impedance] are the main reasons for differences between audio cables. The »sound« of a cable is principally determined by the interaction between source and termination [load]. Its rather the impedance behaviour at input and output than the cable design that makes connected audio components »behave differently«. So its necessary to optimise the transferred power between source and receiver by connections with little reflectance using the construction of a transmission line. This is the precondition for an optimal, undisturbed and controlled signal transmission. Interferences are eliminated, and the signal conduction is lossless. You use 75 ohm cables and connectors for digital connections? Are your signalleads correctly matched and do they provide an optimum of power transfer, how much power gets absorbed or reflected? The connections can be clarified with one aspect among numerous others: cicable cables are coaxial constructions with a well defined cable impedance [e.g. digital cables 75ohm], and a matched connector. The illustration points out the dependence of the cable qualities and connector types. Although all cables induce a certain mismatch, it makes sense to say that proper cable design should aspire to a correct impedance adjustment and a minimization of mismatch. As stated before, this is only one important element for differences between cables. |
|||
![]() |
Furthermore,
cicable digital and analogue cables are...
cicable
digital and signal cables feature clearly audible reproduction
improvements, they sound...
The
result: top highend cables with an optimal signal &
power transfer with constant impedance characteristic, low modulation
effects and improved signal and power transfer, especially
for transient and pulse signals. |
|
||
![]() ![]() The graph shows the »soft« damping of radiofrequency distortions at rising frequency. |
Standard power cables generally have two serious disadvantages: They have too small a diameter [current!] and they are ideal antennas for RF frequency distortions. The cicable PC3+1 EMC is the audiophile power cable with special qualities, contributing a significant enhancement of sound reproduction: High detail and dynamics without exaggeration, silky clean and balanced musicality. These are the materials that improve every HiFi system! cicable power cables are especially built for digital and power components, but also in other application areas they exhibit their outstanding qualities of noise suppression. In opposite to standard mains cables the PC3+1EMC is a power cable taking account into the latest perceptions of EMC / EMI. Among other things, the PC3+1 is superior to standard power cables due to its structure: In comparison to usual power cables the PC3+1 features a diameter of 4x1.5mm2. This ensures a low impedance and low loss coupling to handle highest current, which is an essential precondition if peak power is to be released without loss. The most important features: Based upon EMC/EMI shielding technology, the power cable is both resistant against radiated RF and conducted distortions.
The
soft lowpass filtering without filter or power losses
ensures the best dynamic properties of connected components.
Magnetic and electrical couplings are effectively suppressed.
[further specs, examples and information
:: PC 3+1EMC].
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
Differences
between the original and the cicble crossover. |
Up to now most improvements of loudspeakers were accessory upgrades, like cables, stands, spikes etc. This time the cicable® external crossover, designed by Derek Hughes, best known for his work at Spendor, shows the full potential of a really well engineered crossover / speaker combination. First versions supports two legendary classical monitor speakers: the BBC LS3/5a and the Spendor BC1xxx. Crossovers for other high end speakers are planned in the future. We also design and optimise individual solutions for customers on special request, please call us for further information. Both cicable xovers are designed as a »no compromise« device and will improve your high grade speaker system more than any other accessory. The crossovers are designed as external units, so that they are not influenced by the loudspeaker cabinet vibrations and the magnetic field of the drive units [like a magnetic »DC offset« ] which is reduced by the factor of 10. Special overdimensioned components will reduce the amount of distortion by more than 50dB, so that distortion mainly depends on the amplifier and not on the loudspeaker xover design. The xovers are available in two versions, STANDARD and PREMIUM. The PREMIUM version has further refinement in performance because of even better components in the signal path as well as tighter tolerances. We believe that this upgrade path is, for many highend and music enthusiasts, the solution that gives the greatest audible improvement to the quality of their system and will be an unrivalled accessory. The result with both versions are overwhelming. First reviews in England and Germany describe the crossovers as »killer crossovers« . These crossovers a must for any serious music and hifi enthusiast ! Further and more detailed information you wil find here :: next.
|
|
||
| all rights reserved – copyright 1998 > 2006 |
||||